The realm of artificial intelligence (AI) is expanding rapidly, bringing forth innovations that challenge our traditional understanding of creativity and invention. AI’s increasing involvement in the generation of inventions poses a unique challenge to the field of patent law and intellectual property. 

The burgeoning scale of AI-generated inventions introduces new legal challenges in the realm of patent law. AI systems are not only assisting human inventors but are becoming inventors themselves, creating a paradigm shift in the way we view and handle innovations.

Exploring the AI Invention Landscape

The surge in AI inventions is not just a glimpse into the future of technology but a current reality reshaping numerous industries. 

The realm of AI-generated inventions is not limited to one field but spans across various sectors. This broad spectrum of AI inventions showcases the system’s capability to autonomously generate ideas and solutions that were traditionally the domain of human intellect​​.

AI Revolution in Healthcare

For instance, AI has made significant contributions in life sciences, where obtaining patent protection for AI-generated inventions has become a growing concern. These inventions include AI’s role in drug discovery, medical diagnostics, and even the creation of new medical devices. The adoption of AI in healthcare has already started to revolutionize diagnostics, image analysis, radiology, pathology, and patient monitoring. 

AI Advancements in Finance

In the financial sector, AI is also a game-changer. From risk management to fraud detection and prevention, AI is reshaping how financial institutions operate. AI algorithms are now integral in customer relationship management, algorithmic trading, and personalized banking services. These innovations enhance customer experience and optimize financial operations, making them more secure and efficient.

AI Innovation in Travel, Transportation, and Logistics

The travel, transportation, and logistics industries are also witnessing a transformation powered by AI. Advanced AI algorithms optimise routes, predict maintenance needs, and enhance safety measures. This not only improves operational efficiency but also contributes to sustainable practices by reducing waste and optimizing resource utilization.

In the past few years and even months, AI’s role has extended across many more areas – from creative industries and marketing to discovering new materials through deep learning. These advancements are not just augmenting human capabilities but are leading to the creation of entirely new methods and technologies. The issue is are our policies and legal framework ready for such rapid change. 

Artificial Intelligence Inventions: Legal Challenges

The rise of AI-generated inventions brings forth the question of their patentability. Patent protection is essential for fostering innovation and ensuring that inventors – be they human or AI – are rewarded for their creations. However, the current legal framework around patents was designed with human inventors in mind, leaving AI-generated inventions in a legal gray area.

Appropriate Policies for IP Challenges

The intellectual property (IP) challenges presented by AI inventions demand a reevaluation of existing policies. There is a growing need for legal frameworks that can accommodate the unique characteristics of AI-generated inventions while ensuring that the rights of human inventors are not undermined.

AI: Inventor or Tool?

A central question in the debate is whether AI should be considered an ‘inventor’ or merely a tool used by human inventors. This distinction has significant implications for patent law and the attribution of inventorship.

Natural Persons, AI, and Inventorship

One of the most notable cases is the Artificial Inventor Project, led by Dr. Stephen Thaler, who submitted patent applications listing an AI system named DABUS (Device for the Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience) as the inventor. This move challenges the traditional view that only humans can be inventors, as most jurisdictions require a natural person to be listed on a patent application​​. 

DABUS is a connectionist AI that uses neural networks to generate and assess new ideas. Dr. Thaler has filed patents for two inventions created by his AI system DABUS, namely a fractal container and a neural flame. 

Despite these efforts, the global consensus, with few exceptions, is that an inventor must be a human or a legal person. Key outcomes of this debate include:

  • United States: The US Supreme Court, US Patent and Trademark Office rejected Dr. Thaler’s applications, emphasizing that the term ‘inventor’ applies only to humans.
  • United Kingdom: The Supreme Court supported the UK’s Intellectual Property Office (IPO) refusal of Dr. Thaler’s applications, stating that the inventor must be a natural person. 
  • European Patent Office: Ruled that an inventor must be a person with legal capacity, denying Dr. Thaler’s applications as DABUS cannot transfer rights.
  • Australia: The Full Court of the Federal Court ruled that only a natural person can be an inventor, overturning a previous decision that included AI systems.
  • Additionally, Dr. Thaler’s applications have been unsuccessful in several other countries including New Zealand, Taiwan, Israel, Korea, Canada, Brazil, and India. In Germany, a court allowed a patent with Thaler named as the inventor who used DABUS to create the invention, but this decision is subject to appeal.

To date, only South Africa and Saudi Arabia have deviated from this trend, though the patents there have not undergone substantive examination. Dr. Thaler has also filed applications in China, Japan, Singapore, and Switzerland, and it remains to be seen whether these will provide further exceptions to the global trend.

AI’s Role in Patent Application and Drafting

While patent agencies and high courts are forming a consensus around the idea that AI cannot be recognized as an inventor, there is a very different opportunity to explore the relationship between AI and patent drafting. Gen-AI based patent drafting tools in the patent application are now on the rise.

While AI cannot replace human legal professionals for now, it can enhance the legal framework by providing algorithms that make patent documentation more streamlined, cost-effective, and efficient. This led to the development of some AI-powered tools for patent professionals.

Through automating routine tasks, analyzing complex legal documents, and ensuring current legal knowledge, IP Author, for example, empowers attorneys to concentrate on strategic planning and client interactions, which are crucial elements that benefit from the human element.

Benefits of AI in Patent Drafting

AI’s involvement in patent drafting offers numerous benefits. AI-powered patent drafting platforms significantly reduce the time required for legal research and document analysis. Such tools allow patent attorneys to focus on more complex aspects of patent applications. Moreover, AI-based patent search can help in organizing and tracking relevant documents, ensuring a more efficient and error-free process. 

The European Patent Office (EPO), for example, is leveraging AI in patent processing. In 2019, EPO created a dedicated Data Science team to apply artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies to increase efficiency and quality in the patent grant process. Today, they apply AI in areas such as classification, search, and machine translation in the patent grant process.

The EPO’s adoption of AI technologies demonstrates the potential of AI to revolutionize the field of patent law, making the process more efficient and accessible.

AI-Powered Patent Writing Software

AI-powered patent drafting software represents a significant advancement. This tool exemplifies the integration of AI in streamlining the patent application process, making it more efficient and user-friendly for both attorneys and inventors.

While AI as an inventor presents legal challenges that are yet to be resolved, its role in aiding the patent application process is undeniable.

Leave a Reply